Even for students who are
comfortable communicating online, collaborating and engaging with peers in an
academic online environment is a learned skill that needs to be taught – if for
no other reason than to explain the specific communicative tools in the context
of your course / module. Just as you would create a course overview to orient
individual students to the online course environment, the same orientation is required
for the collaborative or social spaces (e.g. forums or chat rooms), explaining
to students how and when these spaces should be used and providing guidance for
engaging in constructive, academic or reflective discussions.
It is further important to take time to
establish the social environment before embarking on module discussions. Gilly Salmon (2011) places ‘online
socialisation’ as the second step of e-moderated learning (after welcoming
students to the course) and characterises it
as the building of bridges between ‘cultural, social and learning
environments’.
Netiquette
Netiquette may be narrowly defined as ‘etiquette online’. However, in the context of academic online discussion boards, it is more useful to consider it as an outline of expectations, or the setting of clear ‘rules of engagement’ for this particular learning tool. A typical guideline (such as this useful infographic, left) might incorporate a ‘discussions etiquette’ paragraph among other advice and expectations for online discussion.
A useful approach to consider when
designing meaningful discussion tasks is to begin with the end in mind. This
involves working back from a particular learning outcome and, at each point,
thinking about what students will need to understand in order to arrive there.
When designing the task you can follow these steps:
Firstly, clarify (to yourself) the purpose of the activity:
Firstly, clarify (to yourself) the purpose of the activity:
·
How do the ideas & information to be discussed fit
into the course as a whole?
·
What skills, knowledge, perspectives, or sensibilities
do you want students to walk away from the discussion with?
·
How will you make sure your students meet those objectives?
Then....
1. Once you’ve answered the questions
above, the instructional design team will be able to advise on the best format for the activity (e.g. a
discussion forum for a large group, smaller group chats, a live seminar, etc.).
2.
When you draft the introduction/brief
for the activity, remember to outline the
intended benefit of the activity to your students, and to frame the
activity within the broader course (in terms of learning outcomes or themes).
3.
Clarify
your role for this specific activity, to both yourself and your
students. Will you be leading the discussion, responding to content questions, sparking
new ideas, observing their engagement, evaluating the quality of dialogue or
assessing their actions?
4.
Before you start the activity, clearly communicate your own availability
in order to manage students’ expectations in terms of how often they can expect
responses or active engagement from you.
5.
List the resources (e.g. notes or readings), technology (e.g. Internet-enabled
device) and time investment expected from students in order for them to ensure
that they can participate in the activity.
6.
Getting
the ball rolling: You may want to recap any ‘ground rules
for engagement’ (See: Netiquette), and
then start with a light icebreaker or
other ‘spark’ (such as an interesting video clip, a link to a newspaper
article or juxta-positioning of opposing viewpoints, in order to start the
conversation.

Comments
Post a Comment